Bonjour from Paris!

I’m in France for ten days with my history-teacher husband. On the itinerary are many places we’re both eager to see, including Lyon, some chateaux in the Loire Valley, the Bayeux tapestry, and the beaches and battle sites of Normandy. But Saturday was a special day for me. We visited the Paris sewers.

IMG_2688 2Yes, there is actually a museum devoted to exploring the sewers beneath the streets, of which Parisians get to be very proud. If you’ve read my Poop book, you’ll know that London was the first major city to build massive sewers, thanks to Sir Joseph Bazalgette. But Paris followed suit just a few years later. In 1854, Eugene Belgrand was appointed to be head of the Parisian Water Board. IMG_2709His brilliant idea was to build aqueducts that supplied drinking water drawn from up river. His plan was completed in 1894, but not before Paris experienced serious cholera outbreaks as well as a major Big Stink, similar to the one in London in the 1850s. Interestingly, there’s no mention of the Paris Big Stink in the museum exhibit. But they have models of dredger wagons, which were used to move the euphemistically called “hybrid mixture” along and which then “irrigated and fertilized” fields downstream from the river. I’ve always felt sorry for those residents living downstream from these major urban engineering projects.IMG_2723 IMG_2729

I learned about the so-called “cleaner balls” that are used to clean the sewers. They’re these giant floating balls that are slightly smaller than the tunnel’s circumference—the waste water is pushed through it around the ball at high speed. Here’s a picture. (The French, I’ve found, like to put cheerful faces on a lot of their signage.)IMG_2717Screen Shot 2014-07-19 at 10.36.26 PM IMG_2732

You can actually stand on grated flooring and watch the water whoosh by you as you make your way through the exhibit. Yes, it was a little sulphurous smelling down there, but I can’t begin to tell you how cool it was. Here’s a five-second video: IMG_2706My husband, I noticed, kept well away from the open grates. It was mostly me and the ten year old boys who ventured over them.

More than you want to know? All right, I’ll switch to open sewers channels in the streets.

We were walking through a lovely medieval district called Le Marais, which is also known as the Jewish quarter. I had to snap a picture of this narrow, cobbled street, which still has an open channel running through it the way it must have four hundred years ago.IMG_2738

Triple Tragedy

Credit: The National Trust

Credit: The National Trust

On Monday I blogged about this portrait of Richard Croft’s children—where Herbert, aged ten, is lying in the pose of Melancholy, in the background in partial shadow, due to his having died.

The children’s father, the 6th Baronet Richard Croft, has his own tragic story.

Croft was a doctor from an aristocratic family, and in 1817 he became the personal physician overseeing the pregnancy of Princess Charlotte, second in line, after her father, to the British throne. At the time, doctors could do little to hasten the birth of a child during a difficult labor; labor-hastening drugs were not available, and, in this pre-anesthesia, pre-antibiotic world, Caesarean section almost always led to the death of the mother, from shock or sepsis. Obstetrical forceps were known, but Croft was part of a group of influential obstetricians who thought they should be used only as a last resort.

Princess Charlotte and Prince Leopold on their wedding day

Princess Charlotte and Prince Leopold on their wedding day

The princess went into labor two weeks after her expected due date. After fifty hours of difficult labor, she finally delivered a nine pound baby boy, but he was stillborn. The princess lost more blood, began vomiting, and died five hours after delivery, probably from hemorrhagic shock. She was 21.

The nation was grief stricken. Had the princess survived, she would have become Queen of England upon the death of her unpopular father, George IV, and her grandfather, George III, whom the public perceived as mad.

Although a report issued two weeks later held Dr. Croft blameless for the beloved princess’s death, it’s likely that had he used forceps both the baby and the mother might have been saved.

Despondent about the deaths, Croft shot himself three months later.

After Charlotte’s death, there was a scramble to determine who would succeed the Prince Regent, who was 59 and had no more legitimate offspring. The brothers of the prince regent (Charlotte’s father), were ordered to dump their mistresses and find suitable wives. One of Charlotte’s uncles, Edward, the Duke of Kent, was hastily married off to the sister of Leopold (Charlotte’s widower). The line of succession would pass to Edward, and then to their child, who was born in 1819. She assumed the British throne in 1837, as Queen Victoria.

 

 

Sources: Pitkin, Whom the Gods Love Die Young: A Modern Medical Perspective on Illnesses that Caused the Early Death of Famous People 48-51
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/10/09/061009fa_fact?currentPage=all
http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2012/mar/13/brighton-royal-pavilion-princess-charlotte

Skeleton Suits

skeleton-suit

Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuñiga (1784–1792), possibly 1790s Francisco de Goya y Lucientes (Spanish, 1746–1828)

I have a new book coming out next February with National Geographic. Here’s the cover. The subject is fashion, namely, a history of the world through the lens of what people wore, and why. It’s in the final layout phase now. The layout phase has been so much fun, because I love, love, love to do image research. The one downside of image research is that it’s so easy to get sidetracked.

Here’s one story I couldn’t resist sharing. I was researching late 18th century children’s wear and, specifically, looking for an image of a boy in a skeleton suit. During the Enlightenment, the Great Thinkers were urging a return to the natural state. In Rousseau’s famous essay on education (Emile ), he urged parents to de-hoop and de-corset their children (well, at least the boys). As he put it:

The limbs of the growing child should be free to move easily; there should be nothing tight, nothing fitting closely to the body, no belts of any kind . . .

After that, the skeleton suit—a loose-fitting, relatively unrestrictive garment, became all the rage. (Rousseau didn’t exactly practice what he preached, though, when it came to giving children an unrestricted upbringing. He fathered five children out of wedlock with his housekeeper, and sent every one to the foundling hospital. Nice, JJ.) For more on children’s wear and skeleton suits, see my blog post here.

Here’s the picture I found, painted around 1803 by John James Halls:

Credit: The National Trust

Credit: The National Trust

These are the children of one Richard Croft. (More about Richard on the next blog–his is a fascinating story.) There’s Thomas, in the red and gold sailor suit, blowing bubbles. Francis, aged five, is in the white dress, and the baby is named Archer. But the poignant one is Herbert, in black with a book. He would have been ten years old. The painter put him in the traditional pose of Melancholy, because Herbert is dead. He sat for the artist early on, but by the time the paining was finished, in 1803, he had died.

 

 

 

 

 

Curve Balls

Torsten Bolten,  (http://creativecommons.via Wikimedia Commons

Torsten Bolten, (http://creativecommons.via Wikimedia Commons)

We’re in World Cup Soccer Frenzy mode in my house, and sad as it was to see the U.S. lose to Belgium on Tuesday, it was an incredible game. I am married to a former goalkeeper and have spawned two goalkeepers and a midfielder, so even though I’m not super knowledgeable about the game, I have lots of people around me who can answer my questions.

For instance, there was that unbelievable goal by Jermaine Jones in the game against Portugal. In case you missed it, here’s a video. Sorry about the ad you have to slog through first.

Did you see how the ball curves around and then at the last instant bends in and down and lands in the net? It seems to defy the laws of physics. “That was crazy!” I yelled. “How did he even do that?”

Yes, I have a lot of people around me who can answer my questions, but real sports fans hate being bothered by people like me in the middle of a game. So no one answered me. “It was, like, right out of The Matrix!” I persisted. “How did he—how does that even happen?”

Finally my husband said, “Go ask Rusty.”

So I asked Rusty. He’s a friend of ours who happens to teach physics. And he told me that Jermaine’s kick was not in violation of the laws of physics. On the contrary, he said, it can be explained by something called the Magnus Effect.

Heinrich Gustav Magnus, German chemist and physicist.

Heinrich Gustav Magnus, German chemist and physicist.

The Magnus Effect was discovered by a guy named Gustav Magnus (1802 – 1870), who was investigating why cannonballs tended to swerve in their flight path. When an object spins through the air, various forces are acting on it, besides gravity, which everyone knows about. According to the Magnus Effect, you can predict a parabolic path according to the way the ball is spinning. If it’s going clockwise, there’s a force perpendicular to the spin axis (a top spin) that forces it down. If it’s spinning counterclockwise, the force pushes it up. A tennis player will hit a ball with topspin to get it to curve down. A golfer will strike a ball with backspin, so the force pushing it upwards tends to keep it in the air longer. A pitcher can make a ball curve around a vertical axis, which makes it curve off to the left or to the right (depending on the direction it’s spinning) causing it to swerve away from the batter.

Jermaine’s ball, from what I can tell by watching the video from different angles, seems to be rotating counterclockwise, but more or less on a vertical axis, which is why it acts like a curve ball. At the last instant, it swerves to the left and drops in.

Here’s a video Rusty sent me, which helps explain the physics.

It’s About Slime

Wenceslas_Hollar_-_Four_caterpillars_and_a_snail_(State_1)This is hardly breaking news—in fact, the Greek physician Hippocrates (460 – 370 BC) was the first to herald the benefits, but did you know that snail-slime face cream is a hot beauty trend? Creams containing slug mucus have been flying off the shelves in far-flung places like Korea and South America.

According to this article (and many others), Chilean farmers noticed that after handling snails they were breeding for escargot, their hands felt noticeably smoother. The snail’s secretions protect its own skin from cuts and scrapes and UV rays.

And here I thought snails were only useful for food adulteration—snails were tossed into watered down milk in the 19th century to thicken it and add an attractive froth.

Snail slime facials are also a trend. You can watch a video here or see a charming picture here.

And while we’re on the subject: in this painting of the Holy Family by Baldassare Carrari (ca 1485), there are a number of religious symbols that might be lost upon a modern viewer, but here’s one you’ll know from now on. Look carefully at the lower right: you can see a snail trailing slime. 512px-Baldassare_Carrari_-_The_Holy_Family_with_an_Angel_-_Walters_37546Here’s a close-up. Snail slime was meant to represent sin. What a long way snails have come in the way of positive PR.Screen Shot 2014-02-23 at 3.10.13 PM

Shipped Off

Chain_gang_-_convicts_going_to_work_nr._Sidney_N.S._Wales

Chain gang convicts going to work near Sidney, Australia.

Prior to the seventeenth century, convicted criminals in Britain faced grim fates. Few went to prison—the Tower of London was reserved mostly for high class prisoners. Instead the courts relied on one of two options: physical punishment or death. And the latter option frequently held sway–there were 225 capital offenses on the books, including those for mild offenses like petty larceny.

But according to Peter Higginbotham in his fascinating book The Prison Cookbook, British officials hit upon a new solution for getting rid of their destitute and their convicted criminals. They sent them packing. King James I commuted the death penalty into transportation to the colonies. The 1597 Vagabonds Act allowed “rogues, vagabonds, and sturdie beggars” to be “banished out of this realme, and . . . conveied unto such parts beyond the seas.” (42) At first transport was voluntary. But soon it became fairly standard practice. The most common destinations were the American colonies in Virginia and Maryland. Convict wives were welcomed at the Jamestown Colony:

 Female Convicts Transported From English Prisons Arriving In Jamestown, Virginia As Indentured Servants, Although Often Becoming Wives In Mass Weddings With The Male Settlers

Female Convicts Transported From English Prisons Arriving In Jamestown, Virginia As Indentured Servants, Although Often Becoming Wives In Mass Weddings With The Male Settlers

Later on, western Australia was a popular destination.

Bill_Thompson_(Tasmanian_convict)

Bill Thompson, a convict sent to Tasmania.

But in general, England’s creative solution was not quite so popular, particularly with the North American colonists. The convicts were usually sold to plantation owners as servants. In a letter to the Pennsylvania Gazette in 1751—thought to be written by Benjamin Franklin—the policy was deemed “an insult and contempt, the cruelest perhaps that ever one people offered another.”

By 1775, the colonists in North America had received as many as 30,000 convicts. In Britain, old ships were used to house even more convicts, and the conditions aboard the rusted old hulks moored on the Thames were abysmal. Diseases roared through the bulging ranks, frequently carrying off most of the wretched inhabitants of the floating prisons.

512px-Discovery_at_DeptfordBritain had to stop transporting convicts to the American colonies when the Revolutionary War began. In Britain, the big backlog of convicts was temporarily eased by allowing convicts who were eager to escape the hangman to enlist as soldiers.

On a side note–Georgia, the thirteenth colony, was founded by debtors. (In those days, people who could not pay their debt were thrown into prison. I did a post about debtors’ prisons here.) In 1732, a parliamentary committee selected 113 debtors and packed them off to Georgia, where they landed in 1733. It was thought to be a nice alternative to prison, and a place to begin anew.

 

 

 

 

 

Dead But Not Gone

Yesterday in the New York Times there was an article about a growing fad in New Orleans and elsewhere for propping dead people in life-like poses. The idea is that loved ones who attend the wake may have one last look at their dearly departed sitting at their kitchen table, straddling their Harley, or standing with their hands on their walking cane, a hat tilted at a jaunty angle. One woman wanted to be seen for the last time standing over her cooking pot.

You can see the article here. It’s pretty creepy, isn’t it? But there’s actually a tradition of propping up dead people and posing them as though they were still alive.

In this blog I wrote about the 19th century phenomenon of taking pictures of dead loved ones. (Also here.) As photography became more popular, many people commissioned these so-called memento moris, or post-mortem pictures. The saddest ones are of dead children, and I won’t post those here, but here are some other examples.death-photo-7 Victorian-death-photos2 death-photo-8

My Next Book–Cover Reveal!

Richard Sackville, 3rd Earl of Dorset, c. 1613.

This is NOT the cover: it’s a portrait of Richard Sackville, 3rd Earl of Dorset, c. 1613. I just liked his outfit.

Regular frequenters of this blog know that I have been working on a book about the history of crazy/wacky fashions. It’s going to be published by National Geographic Kids next February (2015). And at long last, I have a cover to show you. Are you ready? I wanted to give you the “ta-da!” moment, so I’m going to make you scroll down . . .

 

down . . .

 

down . . .

 

Ta-da!! Screen Shot 2014-06-09 at 7.46.31 AMSo what do you think? This is my first time working with Nat Geo, and they’ve been awesome, but perhaps because it’s Nat Geo, about a billion people have had to weigh in with opinions about the cover, way more than I’ve been accustomed to with my other books. And this final version was not completely what I had imagined the cover would look like. But the more I’ve looked at it, the more I’ve appreciated how much my opinion was listened to. I wanted it to say “history,” because the book is history-through-fashion (as opposed to the history of fashion). I asked for a mix of genders, for the inclusion of people of color, and that women not pose in coquettish poses. And they listened. So I’m happy. I’d love to hear what you think!

How to Rent Friends and Influence People

Piero Nanin, The Lady and Her Cicisbeo, 1840

Piero Nanin, The Lady and Her Cicisbeo, 1840

I went to a party in New York City last Saturday night. It was a super fancy party, with amazing food, fabulously-dressed guests, and an incredible band. But around midnight or so, after the party had been in full swing for several hours, I noticed some new people on the dance floor. They were both men and women, dressed in outlandish clothes (the women in demi-cup bras, men with hair bleached white and gelled into six inch vertical spikes, lots of makeup on both genders), and they were dancing up a storm. I realized they were professional party guests, rented out for the evening by the party planner, and their job was to keep the party hopping. I snapped a picture of one of them—it’s blurry, because I shot it from the hip, pretending to take a picture of my husband. (Note: the guy on the right is not my husband.):IMG_2582

I’d heard about these rent-a-guests. My daughter told me she’d seen “professional dancers” at a bar mitvah she’d gone to, but those were a PG version. This was my first time seeing them in action.

SPVIII1

They reminded me of the cicisbeo in eighteenth and nineteenth century Italian cities—Florence, Rome, Genoa, and especially Venice. A cicisbeo was a paid male companion to a married noblewoman, who would escort her to parties, events, and even church.cicisbeo

Sometimes he acted as her lover, but not always. I think mostly he was supposed to provide amusing companionship, to hold her fan or her lapdog, and above all, to look good. Husbands were evidently completely fine with the arrangement and in fact encouraged it, freeing them up to pursue their own amusements.

Row, Row, Row Your Boats

Two of my kids have rowed crew, so I’ve now attended quite a few crew regattas. Of course I appreciate the beauty and synchronicity, but I also know how hard the rowers work in practice, and how grim and repetitive the sport can be. At races, as I watch the rowers stroke past in perfect unison, my warped mind always jumps to a comparison to galley slaves. Recently I did a little research about them.
An_admiral's_galleyWhen many people think of galley slaves, poor wretches toiling away at their oars in dark, stinking ships, they might conjure up images from the movie Ben Hur and ancient Rome. But in fact, the Romans tended not to use slaves to man the oars of their battleships. It was the seventeenth century that was known as “the great age of the galleys.”

According to W.H. Lewis (brother of C.S.) in his fascinating book, The Splendid Century, all the seventeenth century Mediterranean navy powers used galley slaves. Wind and oars were the only known propellant of the age. Paid employment at the oar had been tried and dismissed. The only reliable way to produce the necessary speed and endurance to chase down (or escape from) enemy ships or Barbary pirates was to use the whip on your oarsmen, something that didn’t go over well with paid employees. But as condemned criminals were plentiful in that era, it wasn’t difficult to find candidates to man the oars, people whom you could whip with relative impunity.

Charles_Galley_1688When in 1685 Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes—a law passed by his grandfather Henri IV that had ensured the freedom of Protestant worship in France—many French Protestants (known as Huguenots) who tried to flee the country were sent to the galleys.

So, according to Lewis, the primary groups that made up the galley rowers were deserters, smugglers, common criminals, and, after 1685, Huguenots.

Ferdinand_Victor_Perrot_-_The_Battle_of_Grengam_on_27th_July_1720What was life like as a galley slave? We know something about it from letters and memoirs of Huguenot convicts.

Museu_Maritim_fg02After a long and often grueling march to the ports, the convicts would be sorted into groups of five—these would become the people with whom one would eat, sleep, and work, often until one died of old age or overwork or both. Each group of five men manned an eighteen-foot oar–and there might be fifty oars on a ship. The convicts remained chained to their places. With each stroke, they had to rise together and push the oar forward, and then dip it in the water and pull backward, dropping into a sitting position. During the heat of battle, rowers might be required to maintain full speed for twenty-four hours straight, and be fed biscuits soaked in wine without pausing in their exertions. Those who died—or lost consciousness—were cut from their places and thrown overboard.

Horrific, yes. But there were at least some brief respites from the wretched existence, periods of time when the wind’s sails propelled the ship and the rowers could rest, or, if there were no wind and no engagements, the cruising speed was much less strenuous. And when the ship overwintered in port, the life of a gallérien became almost tolerable. With the rest of the crew ashore, the rowers could spread out a little and actually lie down and sleep. Many gallériens learned to knit, and others were already skilled wig makers, tailors, musicians—and were allowed to employ their trades in rotating weeks ashore.

 

 

 

Images of galley ships from Wikimedia. Convict rowers in Spanish galley La Real by Fritz Geller-Grimm via Wikimedia Commons